Language(s) before the UPC Belgian Local Division
This morning, on 30 May 2023, Belgium’s declaration regarding the language(s) of the proceedings before the Belgian Local Division was published in the Belgian State Gazette. We have inserted a link at the end of this blog to the relevant page of the Belgian State Gazette. Here are the key take-aways.
1. Firstly, four languages are available to conduct proceedings before the Belgian Local Division: Dutch, French, German and English.
2. Secondly, if the defendant has its domicile or headquarters in Belgium, and if proceedings cannot be introduced before any other Local or Regional Division, then the region of the defendant’s domicile or headquarters will determine the language of the proceedings before the Belgian Local Division:
- If the defendant has its domicile or headquarters in a region with one official language, then that language will be the language of the proceedings.
- If the defendant has its domicile or headquarters in a region with multiple official languages, then the defendant can choose between one of those languages.
However, if there are multiple defendants having their domicile or headquarters (i) in regions with different official languages, and/or (ii) in regions with multiple official languages, then the claimant can choose between one of those languages.
3. Thirdly and finally, the judge-rapporteur may order, in the interests of the panel, that the judges may use Dutch, French or German in the oral proceedings and/or that the Court may make any order and deliver any decision in Dutch, French or German together with a certified translation for enforcement purposes.
[1] Addendum – Wet houdende instemming met de Overeenkomst betreffende het eengemaakt octrooirecht.pdf
Recommended articles
New year, new policy: CPVO updates its public access to documents policy
The Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) recently revised its public access to documents policy to align with the European Union (EU)’s evolving transparency standards. Effective since 15 January 2025, the new policy seeks to ensure broad access to all documents that the CPVO holds, while protecting private parties’ commercial interests. In particular, a system of prior confidentiality requests has been put in place for applicants of Community plant variety rights (CPVR).
Read on
Deepfakes in the music industry: Will the AI Act change the tune?
The emergence of deepfake technology, particularly within the music industry, has sparked significant debate and concern. Deepfakes, which are synthetic media generated using AI to replicate and/or manipulate a known artist’s likeness and/or voice, have the potential to revolutionise the music industry.
Read on
WEBINAR VIDEO | When are IP holders liable for enforcing an IP right?
During this IP Update, Sofie Thijssen and Kirian Claeyé revisit when IP holders may be held liable for enforcing provisional measures based on their IP right.
Read on