Size matters: pornographic websites Pornhub, Xvideos and Stripchat designated as Very Large Online Platforms

Size matters: pornographic websites Pornhub, Xvideos and Stripchat designated as Very Large Online Platforms
January 15, 2024

On 20 December 2023, the European Commission designated Pornhub, Xvideos and Stripchat, three widely-used porn sites, as ‘very large online platforms’ under the new Digital Services Act. Peter Bulcke and Jan Clinck explain at what point exactly a platform is considered to be ‘very large’ and to what extent online platforms that do not qualify as ‘very large’ should worry at all about the Digital Services Act.

Designation as “VLOP”: 45 million average monthly active users

In the penultimate week of 2023, the European Commission gave a special ‘present’ for the operators of 3 widely-used porn platforms. Pornhub, Xvideos and Stripchat will each be entitled to call themselves a VLOP or “Very Large Online Platform” under the Digital Service Act (“DSA”) as from now. In doing so, this threesome joins a party of 19 VLOPs, including the likes of Instagram, Booking.com and YouTube.

To become a “VLOP” requires two conditions: first, being an online platform that has at least 45 million average monthly active users in the Union; second, having been designated as such by the European Commission.

The trigger is thus the notion of “average monthly active users”. Although it might seem a quite straightforward and quantitative criterion, two VLOPs, Amazon and Zalando, have already undertaken legal proceedings before the European Court of Justice to attack the calculation that has been made of their “average monthly users”. Pornhub also seems to be questioning the European Commission’s calculation as it recently reported only a monthly user count of 38 million, well below the 45 million threshold. It remains to be seen if Pornhub (or either of the other two new VLOPs) will appeal the designation.

The DSA – much more than VLOPs

The new qualification places the three adult entertainment services in a much stricter regulatory and enforcement regime because additional obligations will have to be complied with. These rules are stricter because, contrary to what many press articles have implied, these services were already subject to the DSA’s scope. After all, the DSA is more than just the VLOPs, much more in fact.

All online intermediary services that transmit, host or disseminate user generated content come within the DSA’s scope. Apart from micro and small enterprises, which come within an exception intended to protect the digital startup scene, the DSA rules apply regardless of the size of the service. What is key, is the qualification of the intermediary service. Depending on whether it qualifies as a ‘hosting service’, ‘online platform’, ‘B2C online marketplace’ or ‘very large online platforms/’very large online search engines’, there are more obligations to comply with.

Far reaching obligations

DSA obligations are broad and diverse. Among other things, all intermediary services must designate a DSA contact point and publish annual transparency reports online. Hosting providers must also provide notification and action mechanisms for content moderation. Online platforms have additional obligations to provide an internal complaint-handling system, respond promptly when “trusted flaggers” report unlawful content, stop using ‘dark patterns’, and offer more transparency to their users about why they are shown certain ads or content. If the online platform allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders, then the platform must conduct a “know your business customer” procedure to ascertain only trustworthy traders are allowed to sell their products on the platform.

Finally, a VLOP should also: assess its own “systemic risks” regarding illegal content on (at least) a yearly basis, be subject to an annual independent audit to assess DSA compliance, should have an option in its recommender system that is not based on profiling, and should provide more transparency obligations regarding its ads.

Mark the date: 17 February 2024

There’s now not much time left for the digital service providers; while the newly designated VLOPS have 4 months to fulfill the duties that come with this qualification, the general entry into force for all covered digital services is 17 February  2024. From then, the DSA will be enforced by the European Commission and the national Digital Services Coordinators. The BIPT should take up this role in Belgium, although this has not yet officially been confirmed.

So, if you’re ‘fashionably late’ to the compliance party, January is your wake-up call. It’s time to start the DSA compliance dance! Need help navigating the DSA maze? We’re here to guide you through it and make sure you kick-off the new year on the right regulatory foot.

For more information, please contact Jan Clinck and Peter Bulcke.

Written by

  • Jan Clinck

    Counsel

Recommended articles

September 30, 2025

100 Deals, Zero Rejections: What Belgium’s FDI Report for 2024-2025 Reveals

The Belgian Interfederal Screening Commission (ISC) has released its Annual Report on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Screening 2024–2025, providing valuable insights into how the country has tried between July 2024 and June 2025 to navigate the fine line between remaining an open economy and safeguarding its strategic interests. Almost no corrective measures During this second […]

Read on
September 17, 2025

Combination therapies in Belgium: how to collaborate without breaching competition law

As the landscape of modern medicine evolves, combination therapies—those that use two or more distinct medicines, often from different companies—are becoming increasingly vital, especially in treating complex diseases like cancer. These therapies promise improved clinical outcomes through synergistic mechanisms of action. However, the reimbursement process for such therapies presents significant regulatory and legal challenges, particularly […]

Read on
September 10, 2025

Sports federations again under Belgian Competition Authority scrutiny in two interim measures proceedings

The Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) has recently ruled on two requests for interim measures against sports federations. Both decisions again highlight that competition rules apply to sports federations and show that interim measures procedures before the BCA can be a powerful tool to change market behaviour before a decision on the merits is taken, even if no interim measures are imposed.

Read on