Webinar Video | Employment Webinar: Telework 2.0 – The New Normal?

Webinar Video | Employment Webinar: Telework 2.0 – The New Normal?
June 17, 2021

During this Employment Webinar Esther SoetensEmma Van Caenegem and Mathilde de Foestraets will discuss some legal and practical telework-related questions that employers and HR-managers have to cope with today.

We also welcome Ms Valérie Vervliet, Advisor in the Department Regulations Well-being at Work, part of the General Direction Humanisering van de Arbeid/ Direction Générale Humanisation du Travail, of the Employment Ministry and Mr Thomas Hagenaers, Regional HR Leader EMEAI, Ascend, who will share some best practices and their own experiences.

Wish to re-watch this webinar? Feel free to email us at events@altius.com!

Contact

  • Esther Soetens

    Counsel

  • Emma Van Caenegem

    Partner

Recommended articles

May 13, 2025

Skipping indexations: myth or fact?

In its judgment of 27 February 2025,[1] the Brussels labour court ruled that an employer in the insurance sector was entitled to unilaterally terminate the company practice of indexing full gross monthly wages exceeding the highest sector-level pay scale. According to the court, the employer had served notice in time to the employees about its […]

Read on
April 24, 2025

The Mons Labour Court’s addition of a new condition for the validity of a non-solicitation clause : the beginning of a new era?

In a recently-published judgment [1] the Mons Labour Court has shed new light on the validity of a so-called non-solicitation clause in an employment contract, i.e. a clause prohibiting an employee from soliciting or enticing away customers and/or personnel from the (former) employer. Where certain case law had already pointed out in the past that, […]

Read on
April 07, 2025

Three months’ protection indemnity for a dismissed DPO

In a recent judgment,[1] the French-speaking section of the Brussels Labour Court confirmed that a Data Protection Officer (DPO) may not be penalised or dismissed for reasons related to his/her function as a DPO, based on Article 38, §3 of the GDPR. The court ruled that the employer had violated this provision as it had failed to prove that the employment contract’s termination was not linked to the employee's DPO role...

Read on