Social fraud inspection audits conducted by the District cells have been focusing on the construction sector: 2020 in retrospect
As the end of 2020 is nearing, it is time for the traditional end-of-year lists. 2020 will undoubtedly be remembered as the year in which the entire world encountered the Covid-19 virus but that has not prevented the Belgian social inspection services from proceeding with its inspection audits. Once more, the available (provisional) data reveals that the construction sector has remained a highly-targeted sector. We have listed some interesting figures in the overview below.
Social fraud inspection audits in the construction sector
According to SIOD’s 2020 action plan, there was an intention to conduct 2,000 audits in the construction sector, including so-called “flash audits” in March 2020.
SIOD recently published the results of the social audits, conducted by the different District cells (Arrondissementscellen / Cellules d’arrondissement) in Belgium, covering the period Q1-Q3 of 2020.
The District cells are part of the Social Information and Investigation Service (SIOD). Each District cell’s key activity is to organise and coordinate social inspection audits concerning illegal employment and social fraud.
An analysis of the data reveals the following:
- So far, a total number of 6,982 audits have been reported. 2,201 of them have been conducted in the construction sector (or +/- 31.5%).
- A total number of 13,309 employees have been controlled, including 3,072 employees active in the construction sector (or +/- 23%). 5,067 self-employed individuals have been subject to an audit, of which 1,524 have been active in the construction sector (or +/- 30%).
- In the context of these 2,201 construction sector audits, 337 breaches (or +/- 15%) were observed in the following areas falling under the scope of “undeclared work”:
|Type of breach
|Number of breaches
|Social security legislation (e.g. non-compliance with payment of contributions on time)
|Violation foreign employee legislation (e.g. employees who did not possess the legally-required work permit and/or residence permit)
- On the occasion of these 2,201 audits, and next to breaches falling within the scope of “undeclared work”, another 1,246 “more traditional” breaches were observed (e.g. relating to working time).
- The data reveal that non-compliance with the Dimona or Limosa legislation almost always results in a formal pro-justitia. The same goes for employing employees without the required work- and or residence permit.
This is not the case for social security-related breaches. We believe this is seen by the fact that in such a scenario, employers often commit to making the necessary social security rectifications, possibly in the context of an amicable arrangement with the public prosecutor’s office.
For the sake of clarity, the figures above do not provide for an overall figure of all types of social inspection audits. The figures only cover the coordinated actions instructed by the District cells. The “standard” social inspection audits, conducted by the Labour inspectorate (Toezicht op de Sociale Wetten / Le Contrôle des lois sociales) are not included in the overview above.
The figures, even though provisional, demonstrate that the construction sector was also in 2020 a highly-targeted sector. We expect this trend will continue in the coming years. Despite the various legislative measures that were taken in previous decades, the construction sector, social dumping and social fraud are still often mentioned in the same breath.
Covid-19 inspection audits in the construction sector
As it is impossible to ignore the Covid-19 crisis from 2020, we also take the opportunity to summarise the results of the flash audits focusing on compliance with Covid-19-related measures in the construction sector. Such flash audits took place in September 2020. 127 companies were subject to such a flash audit, in which 183 employees and 87 self-employed individuals were checked.
|Public Health Passenger Locator Form
|Breaches observed in 12.37% of the audits
|Registration of the place of residence of foreign employees
|Breaches observed in 50% of the audits
|Covid-19 health and safety measures
|Breaches observed in 12.24% of the audits
From these figures it can be concluded that most employers in the sector have been complying with the Covid-19-related health and safety measures, e.g. complying with the social distancing rules.
Although SIOD announced that it would not continue the flash audits in October 2020 and thereafter, it still urges the District cells to continue to control compliance with Covid-19-related sanitary measures. In this respect, it is useful to know that SIOD has published a Covid-19 (sanitary measures) checklist to be used by inspectors. This checklist reveals the attention points that the inspectors are putting a focus upon, such as hand hygiene, social distancing, general hygiene, ventilation, information towards third-parties (e.g. interim workers or external contractors), telework, compliance with the specific and derogatory registration obligation in the construction sector when temporarily calling upon foreign workers or self-employed individuals.
For more information or for audit-related assistance, please do not hesitate to get in touch with Emma Van Caenegem.
As winter settles in, the challenge of working in cold conditions becomes a significant consideration in the professional landscape. Cold working environments raise concerns about employee well-being and potential violations of occupational health and safety standards.Read on
The “hidden protection period” is one of the most remarkable features of the social elections process. The hidden protection period is the period during which candidates already benefit from the specific dismissal protection, even though the candidate lists are only being disclosed to the employer 65 days later.Read on
During this webinar, we guide you through 2023’s highlights, so that you can start 2024 well-prepared and fully-informed.Read on