No retroactive suspension of the notice period in the event of ‘corona’ temporary unemployment
Updated on Monday 15 June- 2pm
Up until now, there has been no suspension of a notice period served upon an employee who has been made temporarily unemployed under the ‘corona’ regime. Such a notice period started during the corona temporary unemployment and continued to run during this period. Given, as a consequence, employers would be able to dismiss employees ‘cheaply’, a draft bill was submitted in Parliament to have the notice period suspended in the event of corona temporary unemployment. The draft bill was criticized as it provided for a retroactive application of this new rule. After having obtained the Council of State’s opinion, which stated that the law cannot have retroactive effect, the Chamber of Representatives has now voted for the law without retroactive effect. However, the new law does apply to notice periods served after 1 March 2020 for periods of corona temporary unemployment that fall after the entry into force of the law.
In the event of an employment termination through the serving of a notice period, such a notice period will only be suspended in those situations expressly provided for by law. This was and is the case for temporary unemployment for economic reasons; and it means that the notice period of a worker in economic unemployment does not run during this period and is extended by the duration of the temporary unemployment.
For either: a notice period served during a period of temporary unemployment for force majeure; or a notice period served before the period of temporary unemployment for force majeure but that continues during such a period, the law did and does not provide for any exception and so the notice period is not suspended.
As a result, many employers, who had placed (a number of) their employees on temporary unemployment for force majeure using the simplified ‘corona’ procedure and who served notice on any employee during this period, rightly assumed that this notice period simply continued during the period of temporary unemployment.
However, several political parties had taken the view that by doing so companies ‘passed on’ part of their dismissal costs to the social security system. Therefore, a draft bill was submitted in Parliament that provided for a suspension of the notice period in the case of ‘corona’ temporary unemployment.
However, this bill not only provided for a suspension as from its entry into force, but also for ongoing notice periods, served since 1 March 2020 that would be effective retroactively during all periods of corona temporary unemployment as from 1 March 2020.
For many employers there was great disbelief as they would then be threatened with having to pay (or have their workers perform) the full notice period after the end of the temporary unemployment.
The legislative proposal received majority support in the Parliamentary Committee on Social Affairs but was sent to the Council of State for its advice during the plenary session in Parliament.
The Council of State issued an opinion stipulating that a retroactive application can only be justified if it is indispensable for achieving a general interest objective, which has not been the case here, and so any retroactive effect in the proposed bill would have to be abandoned.
The Chamber of Representatives, in plenary session, has now followed this opinion and has voted for the bill without the previously proposed retroactivity.
Specifically, this means the following for notice periods served by the employer:
- For notice periods served after the date of publication of the law in the Belgian Official Gazette: full suspension of the notice period during all periods of temporary unemployment under the ‘corona’ regime.
- For notice periods served before 1 March 2020: no suspension of the notice period; it continue(s)(d) to run.
- For notice periods served after 1 March 2020 that are still ongoing: they will only be suspended by periods of corona temporary unemployment as from the date of entry into force of the new law (i.e. as from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette).
- For the part of the notice period that has already expired: no suspension (and therefore no retroactivity).
- For the part of the notice period that still runs after publication of the new law in the Official Gazette: suspension.
An employer made the employment termination of one of its employees on 23 March 2020 by serving 18 weeks’ notice. The employee has been in temporary unemployment through the simplified corona procedure since the beginning of the notice period and will continue to be so for the coming weeks. If the new law is published today (15 June 2020) in the Official Gazette, then the notice period of the employee in question will have run for 12 weeks. Indeed, during these first 12 weeks the notice period will not have been suspended.
However, for the remaining 6 weeks of this notice period, after the entry into force of the new law in the example date, the notice period will be suspended and the employer will either have to ensure these remaining 6 weeks are performed or pay this period as severance pay.
During this webinar, Philippe De Wulf , Esther Soetens, Thomas Gellaerts and Valérie Schouteden fill you in on the “ins and outs” of the social elections 2024.Read on
The next Social Elections will take place between 13 and 26 May 2024. If this period still seems far away, then a first set of written information should already be provided to the representative bodies and to the employees by as early as mid-December 2023 as a first step in the election procedure.Read on
The fight against social dumping: the Flemish government optimises contractor chain responsibility schemes in case of illegal employment
In the aftermath of some highly-publicised social dumping cases in the media, the Flemish government has proposed a zero tolerance policy for bogus posting set-ups involving illegal employment, especially if they involve exploitation and “smart” contractor chain constructions.Read on