No retroactive suspension of the notice period in the event of ‘corona’ temporary unemployment

No retroactive suspension of the notice period in the event of ‘corona’ temporary unemployment
June 11, 2020

Updated on Monday 15 June- 2pm

Up until now, there has been no suspension of a notice period served upon an employee who has been made temporarily unemployed under the ‘corona’ regime. Such a notice period started during the corona temporary unemployment and continued to run during this period. Given, as a consequence, employers would be able to dismiss employees ‘cheaply’, a draft bill was submitted in Parliament to have the notice period suspended in the event of corona temporary unemployment. The draft bill was criticized as it provided for a retroactive application of this new rule. After having obtained the Council of State’s opinion, which stated that the law cannot have retroactive effect, the Chamber of Representatives has now voted for the law without retroactive effect. However, the new law does apply to notice periods served after 1 March 2020 for periods of corona temporary unemployment that fall after the entry into force of the law.

In the event of an employment termination through the serving of a notice period, such a notice period will only be suspended in those situations expressly provided for by law. This was and is the case for temporary unemployment for economic reasons; and it means that the notice period of a worker in economic unemployment does not run during this period and is extended by the duration of the temporary unemployment.

For either: a notice period served during a period of temporary unemployment for force majeure; or a notice period served before the period of temporary unemployment for force majeure but that continues during such a period, the law did and does not provide for any exception and so the notice period is not suspended.

As a result, many employers, who had placed (a number of) their employees on temporary unemployment for force majeure using the simplified ‘corona’ procedure and who served notice on any employee during this period, rightly assumed that this notice period simply continued during the period of temporary unemployment.

However, several political parties had taken the view that by doing so companies ‘passed on’ part of their dismissal costs to the social security system. Therefore, a draft bill was submitted in Parliament that provided for a suspension of the notice period in the case of ‘corona’ temporary unemployment.

However, this bill not only provided for a suspension as from its entry into force, but also for ongoing notice periods, served since 1 March 2020 that would be effective retroactively during all periods of corona temporary unemployment as from 1 March 2020.

For many employers there was great disbelief as they would then be threatened with having to pay (or have their workers perform) the full notice period after the end of the temporary unemployment.

The legislative proposal received majority support in the Parliamentary Committee on Social Affairs but was sent to the Council of State for its advice during the plenary session in Parliament.

The Council of State issued an opinion stipulating that a retroactive application can only be justified if it is indispensable for achieving a general interest objective, which has not been the case here, and so any retroactive effect in the proposed bill would have to be abandoned.

The Chamber of Representatives, in plenary session, has now followed this opinion and has voted for the bill without the previously proposed retroactivity.

Specifically, this means the following for notice periods served by the employer:

  • For notice periods served after the date of publication of the law in the Belgian Official Gazette: full suspension of the notice period during all periods of temporary unemployment under the ‘corona’ regime.
  • For notice periods served before 1 March 2020: no suspension of the notice period; it continue(s)(d) to run.
  • For notice periods served after 1 March 2020 that are still ongoing: they will only be suspended by periods of corona temporary unemployment as from the date of entry into force of the new law (i.e. as from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette).

    • For the part of the notice period that has already expired: no suspension (and therefore no retroactivity).
    • For the part of the notice period that still runs after publication of the new law in the Official Gazette: suspension.

An example:

An employer made the employment termination of one of its employees on 23 March 2020 by serving 18 weeks’ notice. The employee has been in temporary unemployment through the simplified corona procedure since the beginning of the notice period and will continue to be so for the coming weeks. If the new law is published today (15 June 2020) in the Official Gazette, then the notice period of the employee in question will have run for 12 weeks. Indeed, during these first 12 weeks the notice period will not have been suspended.

However, for the remaining 6 weeks of this notice period, after the entry into force of the new law in the example date, the notice period will be suspended and the employer will either have to ensure these remaining 6 weeks are performed or pay this period as severance pay.

Our Experts in

  • Philippe De Wulf


  • Esther Soetens


Recommended articles

February 15, 2023

The reformed recognition procedure for dock workers… the end of a legal battle?

A new Royal Decree of 21 December 2022 substantially changes the recognition procedure for dock workers. This Royal Decree was issued in the aftermath of a long-standing legal battle initiated by two major players in the sector that challenged the very specific Belgian legislation on dock workers. Although the principle that dock work can only be carried out by recognised dock workers fully remains in place, the application process to become a recognised dock worker should now become (more) objective, non-discriminatory and transparent.

Read on
February 10, 2023

Abolition of the reorientation indemnity’s (partial) reimbursement: a (significant) additional cost for employers conducting a collective lay-off

Employees terminated in the frame of a collective lay-off may participate in a redeployment cell, which helps them to find new employment. Any participating employee is entitled to a monthly reorientation indemnity equal to his/her salary inclusive benefits during a period of 3 or 6 months. The employer pays the reorientation indemnity. Until very recently, an employer could obtain a reimbursement from the unemployment office (“RVA”/“Onem”) for the amount of the reorientation indemnity exceeding the statutory indemnity in lieu of notice.

Read on
December 07, 2022

Draft Belgian Whistleblowing Act now adopted in Parliament!

The draft Belgian Act on whistleblowing for the private sector, which transposes EU Directive 2019/1937 (‘the Whistleblowing Directive’) into national legislation, has finally been adopted in Parliament. The Act still has to be published in the Belgian State Gazette and will enter into force 2 months after its publication.

Read on