New rules to deal with the unavailability of medicinal products in Belgium

New rules to deal with the unavailability of medicinal products in Belgium
May 23, 2019

An Act of 7 April 2019 has introduced new measures in Belgium to deal with the unavailability of medicinal products on the Belgian market. The first measure is that a wholesaler-distributor (also ‘full-line wholesaler’) is no longer entitled to sell medicinal products for human use outside Belgium. Second, authority is delegated to the Belgian government to define when medicinal products are considered as “temporarily unavailable” and to the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (‘FAMHP’) to provide guidance on therapeutically-equivalent medicinal products in such a situation. The Act was published in the Belgian State Gazette on 8 May 2019 and thus entered into force on 18 May 2019.

The unavailability of medicinal products on the Belgian market

The Act of 7 April 2019 (‘Act’) amends the Act of 25 March 1964 on medicinal products “concerning the unavailability of medicinal products”.

The related parliamentary papers and discussions stated that the suggested measures are intended to deal with shortages of medicinal products and quotas used by the pharmaceutical companies.[1] Shortages are said to be due not only to manufacturing problems, but also to quotas. Pharmaceutical companies often allocate stock to full-line wholesalers that is strictly necessary for Belgian patients, “because they – rightfully – fear that medicinal products intended for the Belgian market will nonetheless be exported to third countries where the sales prices are higher”.[2] However, the allocation of stock (or quotas) in combination with sales outside Belgium sometimes leads to medicinal products eventually being unavailable for Belgian patients.

The Act tries to deal with this issue at two levels.

Export prohibition for full-line wholesalers

First, full-line wholesalers are prohibited from exporting medicinal products.

In the framework of the distribution of medicinal products, so-called full-line wholesalers[3] fulfil an essential role in Belgium. Full-line wholesalers are the wholesalers entrusted with a public service obligation, i.e. the obligation “to guarantee permanently an adequate range of medicinal products to meet the requirements of a specific geographical area and to deliver the supplies requested within a very short time over the whole of the area in question”.[4]

In view of this obligation, full-line wholesalers are required at all times to have in stock a range of medicinal products to daily and regularly meet the needs of the given geographic territory/ies. To allow this, manufacturers and regular wholesalers are also obliged to supply full-line wholesalers in such a way that they can meet their obligations.

Given this essential role, the new Act now adds that full-line wholesalers can only supply medicinal products for human use to (i) other wholesaler-distributors, (ii) Belgian pharmacies, and (iii) Belgian hospitals. Apart from that, full-line wholesalers can also supply regular wholesalers, but only in the framework of a specific, previously-determined clinical trial and only to the extent that the supply of the geographical area allocated to that wholesaler-distributor is not jeopardised, and further rules can be stipulated by royal decree.[5]

Exporting and parallel importing remain, however, possible, albeit not through the full-line wholesalers, but through regular wholesalers provided that they have an export licence. 

Delivery deadline of three days to full-line wholesalers

 Second, a delivery deadline of three working days can be announced as being imposed on marketing authorisation holders, regular wholesalers and parallel importers[6] companies, and failure to comply will be considered as the product being ‘temporarily unavailable’.

When the explanatory memorandum stated that the new Act aims to ‘enhance’ the position of full-line wholesalers, it is clear that it was not referring to the above-discussed export prohibition. Instead, more likely, it referred to the fact that the new Act indeed provides that a royal decree can define ‘temporarily unavailable’ in which case the FAMHP can provide guidance on therapeutically-equivalent alternatives.[7] This is to be able to better deal with such cases and avoid uncertainty about whether a product is legally-speaking ‘unavailable’ or not.

The royal decrees implementing the new Act have (at the time of writing) not yet been adopted. However, on 10 May 2019, the FAMHP published an update (EN / NL / FR) announcing the new rules that will be stipulated in the royal decree(s). It stated that a delivery deadline of three working days will be imposed on marketing authorisation holders, regular wholesalers and parallel importers when supplying full-line wholesalers. Failure to comply with this obligation, i.e. when the medicinal product cannot be delivered for three working days in a row, will be considered as the product being ‘temporarily unavailable’. In such a case, the supplier is required to notify the FAMHP, which can then sufficiently quickly notify the others involved[8] and, where necessary, take additional action.

[1] http://www.dekamer.be/FLWB/PDF/54/3599/54K3599001.pdf, p. 3.

[2] http://www.dekamer.be/FLWB/PDF/54/3599/54K3599001.pdf, p. 3.

[3] Full-line wholesalers are to be distinguished from other distributors – see the list published by the FAMHP.

[4] Art. 1, 18 Directive 2001/83.

[5] Article 12ter, §1, twelfth section of the Act of 25 March 1964 on medicinal products (Art. 3, 2° of the Act of 7 April 2019).

[6] Article 12ter, §1, thirteenth section of the Act of 25 March 1964 on medicinal products (Art. 3, 1° of the Act of 7 April 2019).

[7] Article 6, §1sexies of the Act of 25 March 1964 on medicinal products (Art. 2 of the Act of 7 April 2019).

[8] The FAMHP also publishes and daily updates its database indicating the medicinal products with supply problems : https://banquededonneesmedicaments.fagg-afmps.be/#/query/supply-problem/human

Written by

  • Kirian Claeyé

    Partner

Recommended articles

March 17, 2025

The new Belgian government’s public health policy: 10 key take-aways for pharma policy

The new Belgian federal government has outlined its vision for public health in a policy paper under the slogan “More money for health, more health for our money”. Public health is a high-priority sector with a significant budget, and the policy paper introduces several key measures that will shape the pharmaceutical industry in the coming years. For pharma companies operating in Belgium, these developments bring both new regulatory challenges and strategic opportunities. Here is a focused analysis of ten key changes and their potential impact on the pharma industry.

Read on
March 13, 2025

CJEU’s DocMorris Ruling: where is the line for pharmaceutical advertising?

The intersection of pharmaceutical advertising, consumer protection, and internal market freedoms remains a complex legal battleground within the EU. In Apothekerkammer Nordrhein v. DocMorris NV (C-517/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) revisited the meaning of ‘advertising of medicinal products’, clarifying how far national restrictions on pharmaceutical advertisements can go under EU pharmaceutical law and internal market principles.

Read on
February 12, 2025

New year, new policy: CPVO updates its public access to documents policy

The Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) recently revised its public access to documents policy to align with the European Union (EU)’s evolving transparency standards. Effective since 15 January 2025, the new policy seeks to ensure broad access to all documents that the CPVO holds, while protecting private parties’ commercial interests. In particular, a system of prior confidentiality requests has been put in place for applicants of Community plant variety rights (CPVR).

Read on