New rules on telework to further limit the spread of Covid-19: update regional measures
Last week, we informed you about the new measures regarding telework at the federal level. In short: teleworking is no longer ‘highly recommended’ but has become ‘the rule’ for all workers whose roles allow for telework, but only to the extent that the continuity of business operations, activities and services permits it. Moreover, companies can arrange well-organised occasions in which employees can return to the company premises if they comply with sanitary measures.
Over the weekend, the Walloon and Brussels regional governments took additional measures to prevent the further spread of Covid-19. Although various media presented ‘compulsory teleworking’ as one of the new Brussels measures, the Brussels government has merely referred to what has already been decided at the federal level in this regard. Companies in Brussels – and also Wallonia – are therefore subject to the same rules concerning telework as set out in our newsflash (with the exception of the night curfew that applies between 10 pm and 6 am in Brussels and Wallonia). Yet, both regional governments have explicitly asked the federal government to increase inspections.
On 27 October, also the Flemish government emphasised that companies should make maximum use of teleworking, but did not announce any additional measures in this respect.
In the meantime, it has been announced at the federal level that a consultation round will be organised with the employers’ federations in order to set up a monitoring system.
For the time being, the reinforced measures will apply until 19 November 2020.
The ALTIUS Employment Team will keep you posted about new developments.
Written by
Recommended articles
The Mons Labour Court’s addition of a new condition for the validity of a non-solicitation clause : the beginning of a new era?
In a recently-published judgment [1] the Mons Labour Court has shed new light on the validity of a so-called non-solicitation clause in an employment contract, i.e. a clause prohibiting an employee from soliciting or enticing away customers and/or personnel from the (former) employer. Where certain case law had already pointed out in the past that, […]
Read on
Three months’ protection indemnity for a dismissed DPO
In a recent judgment,[1] the French-speaking section of the Brussels Labour Court confirmed that a Data Protection Officer (DPO) may not be penalised or dismissed for reasons related to his/her function as a DPO, based on Article 38, §3 of the GDPR. The court ruled that the employer had violated this provision as it had failed to prove that the employment contract’s termination was not linked to the employee's DPO role...
Read on
The long-awaited Coalition Agreement at a glance: what HR measures will employers face? | part 6: (International) labour market
After months of negotiations, the Arizona parties forming the new government reached a Coalition Agreement on 31 January 2025. This Coalition Agreement has announced a number of ambitious measures that will bring about significant changes in employment and social security law. The ALTIUS Employment Team gives you an overview of the most important announced HR measures in a series of 6 “highlights”.
Read on