Last call to implement electronic voting and/or voting by letter for Covid-proof social elections
In principle, the decision to vote electronically should have been taken as early as February 2020, at a time when few had ever heard of Covid-19. Companies that did not do so at that time but, as a result of Covid-19, would like to do so now for security reasons or because their staff still (mostly) work from home, have been given the opportunity to still introduce electronic voting. However, they have to reach an agreement on this issue at the latest on day X + 56 (i.e. between 13 and 26 October, depending on the new election date). Voting by letter can also be an option in these Covid-19 times. The deadline for doing so is also day X + 56.
Electronic voting
| What? | Electronic voting can happen from the usual workstation (the own PC) of the employee at the company’s premises. However, as from the 2020 elections, also remote e-voting, from the employee’s home office is possible, provided that the employee uses the company laptop, the e-voting system is linked to the secured company network and that certain technical requirements are met. |
| Deadline? | An agreement must be reached at the latest on the new day X + 56, i.e. between 13 and 26 October 2020 depending on the new election day (day Y after the resumption of the elections). |
| Procedure? | An agreement on electronic voting must be entered into with all representative trade unions that have put forward candidates for the workers’ categories concerned (blue-collar workers, white-collar workers, etc.). So even if your company does not have any works council or health and safety committee in place yet, an agreement on electronic voting can be entered into. The agreement includes, amongst other things, the categories of employees for whom electronic voting will be used, the special conditions guaranteeing the secrecy of the vote, the arrangements for the proper functioning of the polling station with particular attention to the method of identifying voters and a definition of the usual work place (e.g. it can be agreed that this location also covers an employee’s home office). It is also recommended to agree on what cannot be considered as a usual work place, e.g. the employee’s company car used to travel from client to client, even if this is an employee’s usual place of work. |
| Publication and notice | This decision will have to be notified immediately by means of an information note rectifying the information about the initial day X, either by posting or electronically, e.g. via the intranet, if all employees have access to it during normal working hours. The form must also be sent to the Employment Ministry (FOD WASO, SFP Emploi) via the web application or, if not, by post to the various representative unions. |
Voting by letter
Another option for organising your social elections in a safe way is to arrange for voting by letter.
Voting by letter is only allowed in a limited number of circumstances, which include ‘the situation that staff are significantly dispersed’.
Yet, according to the Employment Ministry (FOD WASO / SPF Emploi), the Covid-19 telework measures implemented on a large scale in companies may involve a considerable dispersion of personnel, justifying, for the categories concerned, the use of voting by letter.
Other options for calling upon voting by letter include:
- In the case of suspension of the employment contract.
- In the case of night work, provided that the following conditions are met: the number of workers employed between 8:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. on the election day (i) does not exceed 5% of the total number of workers employed on the election day; and (ii) does not exceed 15.
- In the case of workers who are not working during the opening hours of the polling station.
As is the case for the extended Covid-19 electronic voting regime, an agreement on voting by letter must be reached with all representative trade unions that have put forward candidates for the workers’ categories concerned, at the latest on day X + 56, i.e. between 13 and 26 October 2020 depending on the election day.
Our Experts in
Recommended articles
Skipping indexations: myth or fact?
In its judgment of 27 February 2025,[1] the Brussels labour court ruled that an employer in the insurance sector was entitled to unilaterally terminate the company practice of indexing full gross monthly wages exceeding the highest sector-level pay scale. According to the court, the employer had served notice in time to the employees about its […]
Read on
The Mons Labour Court’s addition of a new condition for the validity of a non-solicitation clause : the beginning of a new era?
In a recently-published judgment [1] the Mons Labour Court has shed new light on the validity of a so-called non-solicitation clause in an employment contract, i.e. a clause prohibiting an employee from soliciting or enticing away customers and/or personnel from the (former) employer. Where certain case law had already pointed out in the past that, […]
Read on
Three months’ protection indemnity for a dismissed DPO
In a recent judgment,[1] the French-speaking section of the Brussels Labour Court confirmed that a Data Protection Officer (DPO) may not be penalised or dismissed for reasons related to his/her function as a DPO, based on Article 38, §3 of the GDPR. The court ruled that the employer had violated this provision as it had failed to prove that the employment contract’s termination was not linked to the employee's DPO role...
Read on