Focus on social inspection audits in the construction sector…What to expect in 2021?
Last week, the Social Information and Investigation Service (“SIOD/SIRS”) published its 2021 Action Plan revealing the inspection services’ strategy and top priorities for 2021. As over the last few years, the construction sector continues to be highly-targeted. We summarise what you can expect in 2021. We also set out how you can prepare, based on the SIOD/SIRS checklist.
FLASH CONTROLS IN MAY 2021
The construction sector will be subject to so-called ‘flash controls’ in May 2021. Inspectors of several inspection services (social laws, social security, etc.) will jointly proceed with coordinated actions in the construction sector.
Although the flash controls mainly have a preventative and informative nature, the inspection services will in non-compliance cases proceed with the necessary action, including issuing Pro-Justitias.
OTHER TAKE-AWAYS FROM THE 2021 ACTION PLAN
According to the 2021 Action Plan, no less than 2,000 inspection audits can be expected in the construction sector. The flash controls will come on top of these unannounced inspection audits. Social dumping, non-declared employment and social security contribution fraud remain a priority for the inspection services.
In this respect, the 2021 Action Plan not only continues its action points as identified in the 2020 Action Plan but also introduces some new focus actions, which will be embedded in a sector-specific approach, focussing on social fraud phenomena that are typical for the construction sector. We have listed the most eye-catching new actions in the overview below:
Of course, the more traditional “actions” also have their place in the 2021 Action Plan, such as audits focusing on the joint liability for salary between contractors and subcontractors, non-compliance with the legislation on interim work, fraudulent posting set-ups, social dumping audits, Limosa checks, new employers audits, etc.
In addition, the federal minister in charge of the coordination of combatting fraud has announced in a separate action plan that large construction sites will be monitored pro-actively and systematically, not only by the various social inspection services but also by the tax inspection services. More details of this action plan are expected in the coming weeks.
BE PREPARED AND HAVE A LOOK AT THE CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST
SIOD/SIRS has published a checklist that allows employers to proceed with a self-compliance check. This checklist gives an idea of the questions that can be asked by a social inspector and which documents could be requested. An update of this checklist has been announced in the 2021 Action Plan as well.
1. Documents that can be requested in case of an audit
2. Questions that can be asked by a social inspector to individuals working on a construction site
3. Documents that can be asked by a social inspector to individuals working on a construction site
This is not an exhaustive list. Other questions can be raised and other documents can be requested as well. For example, with a social inspection audit on a construction site, in which various contractors are active (as part of a contractor ‘chain’), the inspection services will very often focus on detecting unlawful employee lending issues, i.e. the situation in which workers are being put at the disposal of third-party users whereby the latter exercise (part of) the authority vested with the employer over such workers.
A full copy of the checklist can be found here (Dutch) or here (French).
For more information on this topic, please do not hesitate to get in touch with Emma Van Caenegem.
Written by
Recommended articles
The Mons Labour Court’s addition of a new condition for the validity of a non-solicitation clause : the beginning of a new era?
In a recently-published judgment [1] the Mons Labour Court has shed new light on the validity of a so-called non-solicitation clause in an employment contract, i.e. a clause prohibiting an employee from soliciting or enticing away customers and/or personnel from the (former) employer. Where certain case law had already pointed out in the past that, […]
Read on
Three months’ protection indemnity for a dismissed DPO
In a recent judgment,[1] the French-speaking section of the Brussels Labour Court confirmed that a Data Protection Officer (DPO) may not be penalised or dismissed for reasons related to his/her function as a DPO, based on Article 38, §3 of the GDPR. The court ruled that the employer had violated this provision as it had failed to prove that the employment contract’s termination was not linked to the employee's DPO role...
Read on
The long-awaited Coalition Agreement at a glance: what HR measures will employers face? | part 6: (International) labour market
After months of negotiations, the Arizona parties forming the new government reached a Coalition Agreement on 31 January 2025. This Coalition Agreement has announced a number of ambitious measures that will bring about significant changes in employment and social security law. The ALTIUS Employment Team gives you an overview of the most important announced HR measures in a series of 6 “highlights”.
Read on