Belgium adopts Act increasing the transparency of managed entry agreements

Belgium adopts Act increasing the transparency of managed entry agreements
April 22, 2020

On 16 April 2020, a new Act was adopted by the Belgian parliament to increase the transparency of managed entry agreements (‘MEA’) concluded between pharmaceutical companies and the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (‘NIHDI’). MEAs stipulate confidential compensation mechanisms for the Belgian government regarding the publicly-listed price and reimbursement basis of the medicine(s) concerned. The Act provides that if the Belgian parliament’s Chamber of Representatives orders a management audit, then the Court of Audit is granted full access to the MEAs, including their confidential parts.

Background to the confidential managed entry agreements

Based on Article 111 (better known as the old Article 81) of the Royal Decree of 1 February 2018, pharmaceutical companies and the NIHDI can conclude MEAs, which most often relate to new and often expensive medicines. Under an MEA, the publicly-listed price and the reimbursement basis are complemented with confidential compensation mechanisms for the Belgian government. These confidential compensation mechanisms can be (1) financial-based, such as a flat discount or a price-volume discount based on the expenditure, or (2) health-outcome-based, such as performance-linked clawbacks or outcome guarantees. Health-outcome-based conditions are expected to become increasingly important.

Confidential nature subjected to more criticism  

The importance to provide early access to medicines even when no final reimbursement decision can (yet) be taken, particularly because the (cost-)effectiveness is still unknown or the budget impact is uncertain, has led to a more widespread use of such MEAs. For example, in 2018, almost 30% of the 2018 budget for medicines was used for medicines under an MEA. This popularity has also come with criticism about these agreements’ confidential nature. In the new Act’s preparatory documents, it is stated that the MEAs’ confidentiality is problematic as it prevents the Chamber of Representatives from performing its control over the Belgian government and the effectiveness of the health budget. The new Act aims to improve the transparency related to these MEAs.

Before the new Act, confidentiality could only be waived for the competent authorities for disciplinary, administrative, criminal or civil proceedings or investigations, or in the event that the pharmaceutical company on its own initiative enters into a joint reimbursement procedure with one or more partner countries. Additionally, the members of the NIHDI’s General Council and of the Court of Audit could request access to the actual evolution of aggregated information and under strict limits. The concerned entities who are granted access must respect the MEA’s confidentiality.

Increased transparency by granting wider access to the Court of Audit for a management audit

The new Act provides that if the Chamber of Representatives entrusts the Court of Audit with a management audit (as set out in Article 5 of the Act of 29 October 1846 on the organisation of the Court of Audit), then the Court of Audit is granted access to the entire MEAs, including the confidential annexes, to be able to successfully complete the research assignment. The legally enshrined confidentiality is in such a case lifted only for sharing the information marked as confidential with the Court of Audit.

The Court of Audit remains bound by the confidentiality and, in exception to the general principle, the Chamber of Representatives (or its members) has no right of inspection or information as foreseen in Articles 33 and 34 of the Court of Audit’s rules of order.

Importantly, the new Act will apply only to MEAs concluded after the entry into force of the Act. This will happen ten days after the publication in the Belgian State Gazette, which has not yet occurred at the date of publication of this blog post.

Written by

  • Kirian Claeyé

    Counsel

Recommended articles

November 24, 2022

Can parallel importers (re)brand generic medicines? The CJEU limits the ‘room for manoeuvre’

If a branded medicine and its generic version are put on the EEA market by economically-linked undertakings, is a parallel importer then allowed to rebrand and repackage the imported generic version as the branded reference medicine? After the Brussels Court of Appeal had referred questions on this issue for a preliminary ruling two years ago, the CJEU has now clarified the limits.

Read on
November 16, 2022

Invisible life to the rescue: European Commission facilitates approval of micro-organisms in plant protection products from 21 November 2022

Micro-organisms or microbes (e.g. bacteria, fungi or protozoa) are invisible to us but play a significant ecological role as they help to break down organic matter and produce oxygen. Some of them protect crops from pests and diseases, making them a suitable alternative to chemical-based plant protection. Given its ambition [...]

Read on
July 07, 2022

European Commission Unveils Measures to Unleash the Potential of Health Data

The European Commission has presented its Proposal for a Regulation on the European Health Data Space (the “Proposal”). While it aims to strengthen the rights of individuals and unlock data’s potential for research purposes, it also adds complexity to an already extensive legal framework.

Read on