Abuse of economic dependence – How to calculate potential fines?
After some last-minute delays, the Royal Decree of 31 July 2020 has introduced the concept of abuse of economic dependence in Belgium (for more on this concept, see here). Following this Royal Decree, the Belgian Competition Authority (“BCA”) has now announced how it will calculate fines imposed on undertakings in such cases.
Who can impose fines?
The Belgian Code of Economic Law (“BCEL”) provides that the BCA may impose fines up to a maximum of 2% of the annual turnover of the undertaking concerned. The BCA can also impose a penalty payment up to a maximum of 2% of the daily turnover to ensure respect for its decision. But this only imposes a maximum that the BCA cannot exceed and the law remains silent about which factors the BCA should take into account to determine the amount of its fine.
How will these fines be calculated?
The BCA has recently announced that it will follow the European Commission’s Guidelines on the method of setting fines (the “Guidelines”) to calculate the fines for abuse of economic dependence. The principal steps of these guidelines are as follows:
- Calculation of the value of the sales
This will be done on the basis of the turnover achieved in Belgium by the undertaking concerned that is directly or indirectly related to the infringement. A specific rule will apply if the undertaking in question does not have any relevant turnover in Belgium.
- Determination of the basic amount of the fine
The basic amount of the fine will be based on a proportion of the value of sales, depending on the degree of gravity of the infringement, multiplied by the number of years of infringement.
- Adjustment of the basic amount
- Aggravating circumstances
The basic amount might be increased in particular circumstances (refusal to cooperate with the BCA, repeated offences etc.).
- Mitigating circumstances
The basic amount can be decreased in particular circumstances (effective cooperation with the BCA beyond the legal obligation to do so, the infringement was committed as a result of negligence etc.).
- Specific increase for deterrence
If the BCA considers that the amount of the fine is, at this stage, insufficient to have a deterrent effect, then it has the discretion to increase the fine. For example, this could be the case if the undertaking in question has a particularly large turnover beyond the sales of goods or services to which the infringement relates.
- Legal maximum
It is only at the end of the calculation that the BCA will verify that the fine does not exceed the 2% threshold and reduce it if that is the case.
Conclusion – Legal certainty
By announcing that it will also apply the Guidelines to the abuse of economic dependence shortly after the entry into force of the new prohibition, the BCA has preferred legal certainty instead of the potential uncertainty of new rules. These Guidelines have, for years, been widely-used at the European and national level and practitioners are used to applying them in different contexts. For more information on these guidelines and on the new prohibition on abuse of economic dependence, please do not hesitate to contact our specialist Carmen Verdonck.
 With some minor deviation. For more information: Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003 (2006/C 210/02), available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52006XC0901(01)&from=FR.
The Belgian Competition Authority has declared itself competent to examine mergers and acquisitions between hospitals under its merger control regime, following the Act of 29 March 2021
A lot of uncertainty has existed about the requirement for hospitals to notify M&A transactions to the Belgian Competition Authority (“BCA”). On 28 June 2023, the BCA decided to partially lift the stand-still obligation regarding a concentration between two hospitals, and it further clarified the applicable rules in a follow-up Communication of 14 July 2023.Read on
On 14 June 2023, the European Parliament adopted its positionon the draft AI Act, which brings one step closer an EU regulation for generative AI and other AI systems. This blog gives the highlights of the current draft text, taking into account the newest amendments that have been proposed.Read on
On 7 April 2023, the Belgian Cour de Cassation reversed its long standing case law and decided that (from now on) disputes concerning the termination of exclusive distribution agreements are eligible to be settled by arbitration.Read on