Two kiwis a day to chase constipation away – European Commission approves fruit health claim

The European Commission has authorised a new food health claim recognising the digestive health benefits of green kiwifruit. The claim—“Consumption of green kiwifruit contributes to normal bowel function by increasing stool frequency”—has recently been added to the Union list of permitted claims under Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, following a five-year authorisation process.
Regulation 1924/2006 governs the EU’s very strict rules on nutrition and health claims for food. A health claim is any statement or implication that connects a food product, or one of its components, to health. Only claims backed by generally accepted scientific data that are understandable and meaningful to the average consumer may be used in commercial communications. Health claims are subject to a pre-authorisation process, which includes:
- a scientific assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA);
- Member State scrutiny; and
- final adoption by the Commission.
A long process for the kiwi claim
Zespri International Lt applied for the claim in 2020. After some back-and-forth and tweaking of the claim’s wording, EFSA concluded that “a cause and effect relationship [had] been established between the consumption of green kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa var. Hayward) and maintenance of normal defecation”. EFSA also noted that, to obtain the claimed effect, two large green kiwifruits (approximately 200 g of kiwi flesh) should be consumed daily. This part of the regulatory process took around nine months, with EFSA presenting its positive opinion in June 2021.
It then took another four years for the claim to clear the final hurdle: comitology. This a political procedure in which the Commission and Member States review and approve proposed authorisations.
It appears that the parties involved in the comitology struggled to translate EFSA’s comment on the required daily intake into practical conditions for use. They eventually settled on the following:
- The claim may be used only for (i) fresh green kiwifruits sold as such; or (ii) fresh green kiwifruits that have only been peeled and/or cut – providing a minimum of 200 g of kiwi flesh.
- Information must be given to the consumer that the beneficial effect is obtained with a daily intake of 200 g of fresh green kiwi flesh.
The authorisation was published on 31 July 2025.
Why the green kiwifruit health claim matters
The EU’s health claims framework is conservative, and it shows. First, it is very rare for a whole fruit—rather than an isolated component—to be linked to an authorised health claim. That fact alone shows how restrictive the framework is in practice. Second, the kiwi claim took five years to navigate the regulatory process. Few new claims are added to the EU list, and the authorisation of one—even for a widely consumed fruit—requires years of coordinated effort.
While the system is designed to safeguard consumers and ensure that claims are scientifically substantiated, this case suggests that the main obstacle was not the science itself—EFSA established a cause-and-effect relationship after 9 months —but the political process that followed. The process’s length and complexity call into question whether the EU health claims framework works as it should.
For further information, please contact Bregt Raus (bregt.raus@altius.com)
Written by
Recommended articles
Combination therapies in Belgium: how to collaborate without breaching competition law
As the landscape of modern medicine evolves, combination therapies—those that use two or more distinct medicines, often from different companies—are becoming increasingly vital, especially in treating complex diseases like cancer. These therapies promise improved clinical outcomes through synergistic mechanisms of action. However, the reimbursement process for such therapies presents significant regulatory and legal challenges, particularly […]
Read onTitanium dioxide: General Court strikes down classification as human carcinogen and ECJ now confirms
The European Commission often relies on scientific evidence for its regulatory decisions. But when challenged, how much deference is owed to the regulator’s interpretation of the underlying science?
Read onREACH obligation to register imported chemicals may be assumed by a person other than the buyer
Under the EU’s REACH Regulation 1907/2006, substances must be registered with the European Chemicals Agency before being imported. The duty to register lies with the importer. In practice, the act of ‘importing’ often involves multiples actors, including the seller, the buyer and various intermediaries who move the goods across borders. So, who then should register […]
Read on